TechLaw LLP is a new economy law firm rooted in the business needs of today's American businesses.
As experienced intellectual property attorneys with advanced degrees in a variety of scientific and engineering disciplines, our uncommon skill set enables us to work with virtually any technology.
In addition to our deep, technical knowledge, our attorneys' hands on entrepreneurial experience offers a unique perspective to our clients when providing legal advice.
With recent globalization and the nature of intellectual property, we recognize the magnitude of our clients' needs. Our firm has far reaching capabilities with the ability to manage clients' matters worldwide through a network of foreign associates. At the same time, our unique business model allows us to offer an unmatched agile, individualized and affordable attorney service.
On January 25, 2014, the San Diego Business Journal published an article about a possible merger between Sullivan International and Ohio Co. The article quotes TechLaw Partner and Sullivan board member Ross Epstein, and can be viewed on the San Diego Business Journal’s website (http://www.sdbj.com/accounts/login/?next=/news/2014/jan/25/sullivan-international-merge-ohio-co/).
TechLaw Partner Ross Epstein will speak at the LES (Licensing Executives Society) San Diego Chapter meeting on November 13, 2013 at the Marriott La Jolla. To register for this event or learn more about LES, see: http://www.lesusacanada.org/chapters/usa/san-diego-chapter/november-13-2013-san-diego-chapter-meeting
Even judges sometimes get a laugh from what happens in court. This may seem strange because going to court often seems like a boring, dry, monotonous affair. You’re not alone – a lot of lawyers feel this way as well. And judges have the worst job of all – they are forced to listen tedious arguments and boring lawyers all day. However, even judges need to have some fun once in a while. This case was no different than any other, consisting of somewhat complex copyright infringement subject matter and parties submitting motions just to waste time or delay the inevitable. Plaintiff publisher and model sued Defendant photographer to obtain a declaratory judgment, which is a court-issued determination of rights. Plaintiffs sought to discern who owned the copyrights in the photographs taken of the model. Defendant then countersued Plaintiff … Continue reading